Tsugaru and skeletons
Hey! I wrote another review for the Japan Times, this one of Dazai Osamu's Return to Tsugaru.
Completely unrelated, here's Beatrice Shoemaker's "Ōkyo's 'Skeleton,' Not Performing Zazen; Reflections on the Iconography of the Daijōji's kyakuden":
Ōkyo's "Skeleton" may have been the first anatomically accurate skeleton depicted in a lotus position, but skeletons had a long and bifurcated history in Japanese iconology. Ōkyo's innovative depiction rested on shasei, the realism he adopted from rangaku, Western studies [...]. Until the first officially authorised dissection of a human corpse, performed in Kyoto in 1754 by the physician Yamawaki Tōyō, published as the Zoshi [sic! should be Zōshi 蔵志] Anatomical Record in 1759, knowledge of human anatomy had rested exclusively on Chinese medical treatises. [...] The visual dissonance between the naturalistic skeleton and the traditional, Song inspired waves would have shocked the non-metropolitan viewer, who might not have easy access to Sugita Denpaku's Kaitai Shinsho [another rangaku anatomical work]. Ōkyo effectively uses the latest scientific findings to represent what is left once all that is transient, from human passions to the various processes of aging, disease and decay, have been stripped away.
This article makes a lot of connections that had never occurred to me before, but I wasn't convinced of its titular claim that the skeleton is "not performing zazen" in a non-tricksy sense (shall we say). It may well be "a body cleansed of all that is transient, perishable and corrupt [...] a being who has attained his Buddha nature," but that kind of rhetoric sounds exactly like Dōgen's famous words on zazen, attributed to Rújìng:
身心脱落とは坐禅なり
Dropping off body and mind is zazen.
Given that visibility of the subject is a basic requirement of portraiture, you couldn't drop off much more body than Ōkyo's skeleton has.
languagehat:
What are "the traditional, Song inspired waves"?