![[No-sword]](http://no-sword.jp/images/site/no-sword_banner.jpg)
Lossless notation for CJ stems
Quick notes mainly for myself in the form of examples.
- V-verb: mi, ke
- C-verb: omoh, sak
- exceptions: ar.i, nar.i, etc.
- D-verb: sug/i, uk/e, r/ar/e (る／らる)
- exceptions: sin/0, ku, su (easier just to use the accepted names)
- L-adjective: kanasik.i, yorosik.i (there aren't any short-stem adjectives that end in -sik, are there?)
- M-adjective: yok.i, akak.i (M is for "mijikai", preferred over S because it comes right after L)
- The .i business is to avoid confusion between these and C-verbs. It can be left off where context makes it clear that we're talking about adjectives.
- X-verb (?): X:z (じ), X:ras (らし)
- XD-verb (?): X:mas/e (まし), X:s/e (完了「き」)
- The X: business is for the same reason as the .i business above. It's an extremely ugly way to go about things, but since there are very few X-verbs to worry about, I don't care.
- Reorganize auxes by what they attach to (stem, MZ, RY, SS, other)
- Move sim (しむ) to the stem group with the other causatives
IbaDaiRon:
Is rasi really best considered a verb? It's invariant in form (after the Nara alternative RT rasiki fades away, of course) and never becomes a base for further expansion, right? I think the "Altgrammatiker" simply assumed the existence of identical but independent RT/IZ forms based on kakari-musubi.
Anyway, to help out a bit, of the "Type 2" Aux's in the Iwanami table, tamahu, mausu, tatematuru and saburahu are C-verbs, kikoyu is a D and haberi an ari-type.
(I'm still worrying over suppletion...)